Non-Periodic Phenomena in Variable Stars
                                         IAU Colloquium, Budapest, 1968


          CORRELATIONS BETWEEN THE IRREGULARITIES OF THE PERIOD
            AND RADIAL VELOCITY, LENGTH OF PERIOD, AMPLITUDE
                    AND SPECTRUM OF MIRA-VARIABLES


                            P. AHNERT

         Institut für Sternphysik, Sternwarte Sonneberg, GDR


  There are several well-known correlations between the abovementioned 
properties. However, because there are remarkable differences between 
slowly and rapidly moving Mira-stars (population I and II), I supposed 
that there may also be different correlations for these two groups. I 
have taken all Mira-stars of spectrum Me with radial velocities > 80 
km/s (n = 23) and those with < 20 km/s (n = 42) from Merrill's Catalogue 
(ApJ 94, 171; 1941), which are also mentioned in the "Studies of Long 
Period Variables" by Leon Campbell (AAVSO 1955).
  The comparing shows the following result:


                            Table 1

    V         mean(P)   mean((M-m)/P)   mean(Sp)  sigma_p   mean(A)
  20 km/s     325d      0.436           M5. 42e   +-2.69%   4.85m
  80          236       0.450           M3. 89e   +-3.33    4.24

(sigma_p = scattering of cycles in percents of the period.)


  In the "Studies of Long Period Variables" Leon Campbell gives the times 
and magnitudes of the maxima of these stars from 1920 to 1950 with the 
single cycles, the mean period, the proportion (M-m)/P and the spectrum. 
From these data I have computed the scattering of the cycles in days and 
percents of the period and the scattering of the magnitudes of the maxima.
  Let us regard the slowly moving group. As seen in Figure 1 there is a 
loose relation between sigma_p and the spectrum in the sense that the 
larger the scattering the earlier the sub-group of Me. The relation is 
rather loose; it becomes more evident if we divide the spectra into some 
groups (see the crosses). A corresponding relation exists between the 
scattering and the length of the periods (Figure 2). But this 
coincidence is trivial because it is a well-known fact that the longer 
the period the later the sub-group of Me. And with regard to the 
relation between the scattering of the cycles and the length of the 
period we must take into consideration that the percentage of the 
scattering must be higher at short periods, even if the scattering in 
days is the same for long and short periods. Nevertheless the relation 
seems to be at least partially real. (See also Table at the right side 
of the diagram.)


                             List of the stars

(Other properties see L. Campbell, "Studies of Long Period Variables")

                     1. 23 Mira-stars v > 80 km/s

                                   sigma_p			
			         d	 %				
004533	        RR	And	+-8.8	+-2.66	
004746a	        RV	Cas	+-8.5	+-2.56	
052036	        W	Aur	+-7.3	+-2.68	
065208	        X	Mon	+-9.1	+-5.86	
073723	        S	Gem	+-6.9	+-2.35
083350	        X	UMa	+-6.8	+-2.71
090024	        S	Pyx	+-7.4	+-3.60	
110506	        S	Leo	+-6.9	+-3.63	
123160	        T	UMa	+-6.6	+-2.58	
153620a	        U	Lib	+-8.05	+-3.55	
154536	        X	CrB	+-6.1	+-2.53	
155229	        Z	CrB	+-6.6	+-2.64	
155823          RZ      Sco     +-7.4   +-4.61
180531          T       Her     +-5.7   +-3.45
183308          X       Oph    +-10.2   +-3.04
193509          RV      Aql     +-6.6   +-3.03
194048          RT      Cyg     +-7.0   +-3.64
194348          TU      Cyg     +-6.2   +-2.81
200212          SY      Aql    +-10.3   +-2.91
200715a         S       Aql     +-6.7   +-4.52
215934          RT      Peg     +-8.2   +-3.81
220613          Y       Peg     +-6.4   +-3.10
225914          RW      Peg     +-9.3   +-4.43


2. 42 Mira-stars v < 20 km/s

                                  sigma_p
                                 d       %
				
010102	        Z       Cet	+-8.4	+-4.6	
010940	        U       And	+-9.1	+-2.6
050953	        R       Aur    +-11.7	+-2.5	
052404	        S       Ori    +-11.7	+-2.85	
053531	        U       Aur    +-10.2	+-2.5	
072820b	        Z       Pup    +-13.3	+-2.6	
075612	        U       Pup     +-7.8	+-2.2	
081112	        R       Cnc     +-9.7	+-2.7	
094211	        R       Leo     +-7.3	+-2.3
094735	        S       LMi     +-6.2	+-2.65	
102900	        S	Sex	+-6.7	+-2.55	
115919	        R       Com	+-6.8	+-1.9	
120012	        SU      Vir	+-7.3	+-3.5
120905	        T       Vir    +-10.3   +-3.0
122803	        Y       Vir	+-7.7	+-3.5	
133273	        T       UMi	+-8.1	+-2.6	
134536	        RX      Cen	+-8.4	+-2.6	
140528	        RU      Hya	+-9.8	+-2.9	
143417	        V       Lib	+-7.7	+-3.0	
144918	        U       Boo	+-9.1	+-4.55	
154615	        R       Ser	+-5.2	+-1.7
154715          R       Lib     +-7.7   +-3.0
161122a         R       Sco     +-6.5   +-2.9
162816          S       Oph     +-7.7   +-3.3
164844          RS      Sco     +-7.15  +-2.25
182133          RV      Sgr     +-8.9   +-2.8
183149          SV      Dra     +-6.5   +-2.5
185634          Z       Lyr     +-9.7   +-3.4
190941          RU      Lyr     +-9.0   +-2.4
190967          U       Dra     +-7.0   +-2.2
194604          X       Aql     +-8.0   +-2.3
194632          X       Cyg     +-6.65  +-1.6
195202          RR      Aql     +-9.0   +-2.3
195308          RS      Aql     +-9.25  +-2.2
200812          RU      Aql     +-8.2   +-3.0
203429          R       Mic     +-5.2   +-3.8
204016          T       Del     +-6.1   +-1.8
205030a         UX      Cyg    +-13.1   +-2.35
210382          X       Cep    +-10.7   +-2.00
221938          T       Gru     +-6.3   +-4.6
230110          R       Peg     +-7.8   +-2.1
235350          R       Cas     +-8.1   +-1.9





                              Fig. 1

  
  The maxima of the short period stars are more pointed than those of
the long period stars and therefore we should expect that the observational
part of the scattering is smaller for short period stars than for long period
objects. Another argument is the following: From 125 maxima obtained
by two experienced observers (by Nijland and me and by Loreta and me)
I found a mean error of only +-2.5d or roughly 1% of the period for each
maximum, if the mean value has been regarded to be correct. Therefore 
a rest of true physical relation remains in the sense that the shorter the
period and the earlier the spectrum the larger the scattering of the cycles.
  The rapidly moving stars show the same behaviour (Figure 3). The
correlation seems to be steeper but this is only an effect of the shortness of




                              Fig. 2




                              Fig. 3


these periods. If we draw the diagram for all 65 objects, the slowly moving 
stars give precisely the same relation as the rapidly moving ones (Figure 4).
  One can state: If there exists a chemical difference between population 
I and population II Me-stars, the mechanism of the variability is obviously not 
influenced. Both groups behave much more in the same way than the classical 
Cepheids and the W Vir-stars.
  Only the relation between the amplitudes and the scattering of the
cycles shows an insignificant difference between the two groups (Figure 5).
The scattering of the cycles is slightly greater for rapidly moving stars than
for slowly moving objects of the same amplitude. If we form groups of about
seven to ten stars, the difference becomes evident, though it remains small.
  The greater scattering of the cycles of small amplitude variables in both
groups is caused partially by the fact that their maxima are mostly very
flat and therefore difficult to observe. But only for stars with shorter periods
than 200d are the amplitudes of the rapidly moving stars significantly smaller.




                            Fig. 4




                            Fig. 5


For periods longer than 200d the amplitudes of the two groups are nearly equal 
(see Table 2).

                            Table 2

  Period             < 200d       200d-299d     300d-399d     > 400d
v > 80 km/s	mean(A) = 2.67m      4.53m        4.78m		-
v < 20 km/s	mean(A)	= 3.83	     4.40         5.08	       5.88m
    all         mean(A) = 3.05       4.47         5.02         5.88 


  Finally it may be of interest to notice that no relation could be found 
between the scattering of the maximum magnitudes and any other property. 
Diagram 6 gives an example of this fact. Each sub-group of Me contains stars 
with high and with small scattering of the maximum brightness.